Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Med Syst ; 46(12): 95, 2022 Nov 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36374361

RESUMO

To evaluate effects of the multidisciplinary preoperative clinic (POC) consisting of anesthesiologists, dentists, pharmacists, and nurses on elective surgery cancellation, we retrospectively investigated patients who underwent elective non-cardiac, non-obstetric surgeries between October, 2018 and March, 2019 (before the POC establishment: Group 1) and between October, 2019 and March, 2020 (after the POC establishment: Group 2). Among reasons for surgery cancellation allocated into eight categories, three reasons for cancellation (related to consent authorization, medication, and significant comorbidities) were considered preventable. We compared incidences of overall and preventable cancellations of surgeries between 4,198 patients in Group 1 and 4,664 patients in Group 2, who had significantly different clinical backgrounds, including the ASA-PS class. There was no significant difference in the incidence of overall cancellation between Group 1 and Group 2 (4.1% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.96). However, the incidence of preventable cancellation was significantly lower in Group 2 than in Group 1 (0.4% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.045). In addition, the incidence of overall cancellation was significantly lower in 3,741 Group 2 patients visiting the POC than in 5,121 patients not visiting the POC in both Groups (3.2% vs. 4.7%, p < 0.001). Further, in 3,423 pairs of patients with comparable clinical backgrounds created from both Groups using propensity score matching, incidences of overall cancellation (2.2% vs. 3.1%) and preventable cancellation (0.1% vs. 0.6%) were significantly lower in Group 2 than in Group 1 (p = 0.036 and 0.008, respectively). In conclusion, the multidisciplinary POC was effective in reducing elective surgery cancellation.


Assuntos
Agendamento de Consultas , Salas Cirúrgicas , Humanos , Incidência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos
2.
J Anesth ; 34(5): 719-722, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32681449

RESUMO

The aim of this special article is to introduce Perianesthesia Nurses (PANs) who play an essential role in assisting anesthesiologists to ensure the safety of patients undergoing anesthesia and to improve the quality of anesthetic care. In Japan, there is no national license for nurse anesthesia providers. Therefore, most of the tasks related to anesthesia are performed by the anesthesiologists. Due to the size and complexity of the aging population, higher quality perioperative care is needed. In search of a solution, PANs were introduced to improve anesthetic care in Japan, enabling anesthesiologists to delegate some of their tasks to PANs who work within the scope of registered nurse's policies. They are a new type of anesthesia care provider in Japan, and different from Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists in the United States. Currently, six schools provide 2-year master's degree perianesthesia nursing programs, and graduates are now providing anesthetic care both inside and outside of the operating room under the direct supervision of anesthesiologists. PANs not only assist anesthesiologists and help to reduce anesthesiologists' workload, but also contribute to the expansion of anesthesia services. They ensure patient safety and improve the quality of patient care before, during, and after the patient undergoing anesthesia.


Assuntos
Anestesia , Anestesiologia , Idoso , Anestesia/efeitos adversos , Anestesiologistas , Humanos , Japão , Enfermeiros Anestesistas , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...